THARUN RATHOD

CH 04 STUDIES

Food Delivery Battle - Swiggy vs Zomato vs EatSure vs Domino's vs KFC

Found the framing effect, emotional onboarding, progressive disclosure, the say-do gap - and a deliberate anchoring exploit in Zomato's Food Rescue screen that inflated perceived savings by ₹70.

Swiggy · Zomato · EatSure · Domino's · KFC

The teardown

Swiggy UI feels congested - too much competing for attentionInformation hierarchy failure
Zomato opens with a quote, not a menuEmotional onboarding
"₹120 off above ₹199" outperforms "60% off up to ₹120" - same money, better conversionFraming effect - Kahneman
I'd still pick Zomato over EatSure despite knowing betterSay-do gap
₹36 gap between Domino's direct app and Zomato - never communicatedMissed competitive advantage
KFC app feels exactly like the storeBrand cohesion - done right
Domino's app has zero personalityBrand inconsistency - product suicide

Both Domino's and KFC built their own apps to escape Zomato's 25–30% commission. KFC won because their app feels like KFC. Domino's forgot to make theirs feel like anything.

  • UX Battle
  • Competitive Analysis
  • Behavioral Economics